Blogs / Tax & Compliance

Tax & Compliance

Form 3CD Clause 22 and Section 43B(h): MSME Reporting Explained

Clause 22 and Section 43B(h) require careful MSME vendor identification, payment-period testing and year-end review. This guide explains the practical workflow.

By Team assureOffice
Published 2026-09-20 · Updated 2026-09-20

Section 43B(h) has made MSME vendor review a major part of year-end tax audit work.

The provision applies to sums payable to a micro or small enterprise beyond the time limit specified in Section 15 of the MSMED Act. Medium enterprises are not covered by this specific clause.

What is the payment timeline?

Where there is no written agreement for the payment period, the MSMED framework uses a period linked to acceptance or deemed acceptance that effectively requires payment within the prescribed 15-day period.

Where there is a written agreement, the agreed credit period cannot exceed 45 days from the relevant date of acceptance or deemed acceptance.

Therefore, checking only whether a creditor is outstanding on 31 March is not enough. Invoice date, acceptance, written terms and payment date matter.

What happens if payment is late?

If a sum covered by Section 43B(h) is not paid within the Section 15 timeline, the deduction is generally governed by the special actual-payment rule for this clause. The normal return-filing-date relief available for several other Section 43B items does not operate in the same manner for clause (h).

The final deduction position should be tested invoice-wise and year-wise.

What does Clause 22 of Form 3CD now require?

The revised Clause 22 requires more than a single disallowance number.

The reporting broadly includes:

  • interest inadmissible under Section 23 of the MSMED Act;
  • the total amount required to be paid to micro or small enterprises referred to in Section 15 during the previous year;
  • the portion paid within the Section 15 time limit; and
  • the portion not paid within that time and inadmissible for the previous year.

Practical working-paper approach

  1. Obtain the complete trade-payables master.
  2. Collect and verify MSME/Udyam status.
  3. Identify whether the supplier is micro, small, medium or outside the relevant coverage.
  4. Check the supplier's activity and whether the delayed-payment provisions apply to the transaction.
  5. Capture invoice/acceptance dates and written payment terms.
  6. Map subsequent payments against outstanding invoices.
  7. Separate payments made within time from amounts crossing the permitted period.
  8. Reconcile the working to the Trade Payables note and books.

Common mistakes

  • Treating every vendor with an MSME declaration as automatically covered without checking the statutory conditions.
  • Including medium enterprises in Section 43B(h).
  • Using only the 31 March outstanding balance instead of testing the payment timeline.
  • Ignoring a late-March invoice whose permitted payment period extends after year-end.
  • Failing to track prior-year disallowances that become deductible on actual payment.
  • Not reconciling Clause 22 with the financial statement Trade Payables balance.

Financial statements and tax-audit workings should agree

The Trade Payables note, MSME disclosure and tax-audit working are connected. A mismatch between them creates avoidable review queries.

assureOffice Financial Builder can help structure the Trade Payables presentation and financial statement review. The tax professional should separately verify the legal Section 43B(h) working and final tax treatment.

For MSME reporting, vendor classification plus invoice-level payment timing is the key. A closing creditor balance alone is not enough.