IndiaLaw by assureOffice
Company Electronic-Record Security: Rule 28 Daily Backups, Restricted Access and Retrieval Tests

Company Electronic-Record Security: Rule 28 Daily Backups, Restricted Access and Retrieval Tests

Test authenticated daily backups, authorised access, resistance to alteration and readable retrieval of company electronic statutory records under Rule 28.

Reviewed by CA BB Gupta · Chartered Accountant & Company Secretary | 45+ years in corporate matters

Modern corporate glass towers

Security duties continue after adoption

For company statutory records kept electronically within the applicable framework, Rule 28 prescribes maintenance and security duties. The responsible person is the managing director, company secretary or another director or officer as the Board may decide. Outsourcing storage is not evidence that these duties have been fulfilled. Notified Companies (Management and Administration) Rules: Rule 28.

Check current adoption language separately

Current Rule 27 uses permissive language for its specified company population after the 24 July 2014 amendment. Older compilations can show the superseded mandatory wording. This article addresses security after electronic adoption; it does not instruct every company to migrate every paper record. Apply other record-specific provisions independently.

Authenticate daily backups and validate systems

Rule 28(2)(i) requires at least one backup of updated records at periodicity not exceeding one day. Every backup must be authenticated, dated and securely kept at places decided by the Board. Retain run dates and covered-record inventories. The rule also addresses system validation, unauthorised access, alteration, invalid-record detection, loss prevention and reproducibility. A PDF extension alone does not establish a non-rewritable, non-erasable implementation.

Test full records and authorised access

Limit access to the specified personnel or persons doing company work as authorised by the Board. Reproductions of paper records must be complete, authentic, true and legible on retrieval. Check annexures, signatures and indexing, while preserving confidentiality. Restore tests are practical evidence for loss prevention and retrieval duties; no universal testing frequency, capacity or sample tolerance is prescribed here. The examples are internal controls, not new statutory retention periods.

Applicable primary references

Notified Companies (Management and Administration) Rules: Rule 28 ICSI current Rule 27 and adoption-language amendment

Six worked illustrations

All facts and amounts below are fictional. Assumptions describe the model, not additional statutory rules.

Illustrative example 1: Backup interval

Assume a 20:00 backup on consecutive dates: 24 hours apart. A missed run followed by the next day’s 20:00 run leaves 48 hours. This tests the chosen elapsed-time schedule.

Illustrative example 2: Access list

Of twelve active accounts, nine have evidenced authority. Three need investigation. The 75% authorised measure is not a legal tolerance.

Illustrative example 3: Restoration inventory

A manifest has 240 records but recovery produces 237. Three are missing. Recovery of 98.75% does not establish complete restoration.

Illustrative example 4: Page completeness

An original has eighty pages including annexures; the scan has seventy-six. Four pages need explanation or recovery, even if the first page is legible.

Illustrative example 5: Capacity model

Assume 2 GB per daily backup and an internal seven-copy rotation: baseline storage is 14 GB before overhead and redundancy. Seven days is not a statutory retention period.

Illustrative example 6: Index coverage

135 of 150 required references retrieve the correct files. Fifteen require correction; 90% retrieval coverage does not establish a complete repository.

Ten-step verification table

StepActionEvidence
1Confirm scopeRecords and governing provisions.
2Identify officerBoard decision where applicable.
3Inventory versionsSigned originals and attachments.
4Restrict accessAuthority for every account.
5Validate alteration controlsActual format and system behaviour.
6Schedule daily backupUpdated-record coverage and timestamps.
7Authenticate backupsDated authentication.
8Test restorationComplete readable output.
9Verify indexSpecific files and annexures.
10Close deficienciesRemediation and validation evidence.

Sixteen practitioner FAQs

1. Does Rule 28 mandate universal digitisation?

Establish scope under the relevant provisions first.

2. Who is responsible?

The managing director, company secretary or another director or officer as the Board may decide.

3. Does cloud storage prove compliance?

No. Validate the implemented controls.

4. What backup periodicity is specified?

Not exceeding one day.

5. Must every backup be dated?

Yes, and authenticated.

6. Who decides secure backup locations?

The Board under sub-rule (2)(i).

7. Is a PDF filename conclusive?

No. Validate protection against alteration and tampering.

8. Are software and hardware controls relevant?

Yes. Security and validation are specified.

9. Must altered records be detectable?

The rule calls for systems that discern invalid and altered records.

10. Can all staff have unrestricted access?

Access must correspond to the specified persons and Board-authorised company work.

11. What must paper reproductions preserve?

Completeness, authenticity, truth and legibility.

12. Why inspect annexures?

The main file can open while required pages remain missing.

13. Is one restore-test frequency mandated here?

No universal frequency is asserted.

14. Does a seven-copy rotation allow deleting statutory history?

No. Apply actual preservation duties separately.

15. Is 98.75% recovery automatically sufficient?

Not where required records remain missing.

16. What should the closing file contain?

Accountability, inventory, access authority, dated backups and resolved retrieval exceptions.

Conclusion

Test authenticated daily backups, authorised access, resistance to alteration and readable retrieval of company electronic statutory records under Rule 28.

Sources and primary references