IndiaLaw by assureOffice
Ind AS 12 Deferred Tax on Revalued Land

Ind AS 12 Deferred Tax on Revalued Land: Apply the Sale Basis Under Paragraph 51B

Measure deferred tax on non-depreciable land revalued under Ind AS 16 using sale tax consequences, and reconcile the movement to OCI and profit or loss.

Reviewed by CA Raghav Agarwal · Chartered Accountant | 10+ years in Ind AS Financial Reporting

Business charts and performance reports

The rule for non-depreciable revalued land

If a non-depreciable asset is measured under the Ind AS 16 revaluation model and gives rise to a deferred tax asset or liability, Ind AS 12 paragraph 51B uses the tax consequences of recovering its carrying amount through sale. Owner occupation and a decision to retain the site do not change that measurement. This is a deferred tax assumption, not evidence that a sale is planned or that current tax is due.

Read the applicable text: MCA: Ind AS 12, paragraphs 15, 24, 47, 51–51B, 53 and 58–63 MCA: Ind AS 16, revaluation model and land/building separation.

Prove the asset and measurement model

Document that the parcel is non-depreciable land in the relevant Ind AS 16 class and that the revaluation model applies. Read Ind AS 16 on separating land and buildings: a shared deed or valuation does not make a depreciable building subject to paragraph 51B. For a depreciable asset generally apply the expected manner of recovery principles in Ind AS 12 paragraphs 51 and 51A, subject to other applicable requirements.

Build the sale tax base

Compare the carrying amount with the tax base under a hypothetical recovery through sale. Obtain the deductible amount under applicable tax law and apply enacted or substantively enacted tax rates and law at reporting date for the expected reversal. A valuation uplift does not itself raise the tax base. Consider sale-specific deductible basis, holding conditions and exemptions only where legally supported. Where law applies different rates to different components, calculate those separately.

Identify the origin of the tax movement

Ordinarily, a revaluation increase recognised in other comprehensive income carries its associated deferred tax into OCI under paragraph 61A. Under Ind AS 16 paragraph 39, recognise an increase in profit or loss to the extent it reverses a decrease for that asset previously recognised there; recognise the rest in OCI. Trace deferred tax to the same underlying component under Ind AS 12, including where a rate change affects deferred tax arising from an item previously recognised outside profit or loss. Separate any pre-existing temporary difference and review paragraphs 60 and 63 when a movement relates to an earlier item or allocation is difficult. Do not net current tax and deferred tax merely because they use a sale analysis.

Finish the closing roll-forward

Reconcile opening temporary difference, book uplift or reduction, tax base movements and rate changes to closing deferred tax. Do not discount deferred tax. For a deductible difference, assess the recognition conditions separately; paragraph 51B selects how to measure the amount but does not establish that a deferred tax asset is recognisable. Use a tax memorandum to support any sale rates; percentages in the examples are hypothetical and are not Indian tax-rate guidance.

Six worked illustrations

All facts and amounts are fictional. Calculations illustrate the stated assumptions, not a predetermined legal outcome.

Illustrative example 1: Owner-occupied land revaluation

Land increases from ₹60 lakh to ₹100 lakh; sale tax base remains ₹60 lakh and the assumed sale rate is 20%. Recognise an ₹8 lakh deferred tax liability. If the entire uplift is in OCI, associated tax in OCI is ₹8 lakh and the net OCI increase is ₹32 lakh.

Illustrative example 2: Existing taxable difference

Opening carrying amount ₹80 lakh and sale tax base ₹70 lakh give opening liability ₹2 lakh at 20%. Revaluation to ₹110 lakh gives closing liability ₹8 lakh. The ₹6 lakh increase relates to the ₹30 lakh uplift, assuming no other movement.

Illustrative example 3: Tax base independent of book cost

Land is carried at ₹150 lakh and a legally supported sale deduction is ₹105 lakh. At 20%, the liability is ₹9 lakh. Substituting original book cost of ₹100 lakh would produce ₹10 lakh and overstate the liability by ₹1 lakh.

Illustrative example 4: Separate land and building

Land carrying amount ₹120 lakh, sale tax base ₹80 lakh and sale rate 20% give ₹8 lakh. A separately modelled building recovered through use has carrying amount ₹90 lakh, tax base ₹70 lakh and rate 25%, giving ₹5 lakh. Gross liabilities total ₹13 lakh before presentation checks.

Illustrative example 5: Partial recovery of a prior P&L decrease

An ₹18 lakh upward revaluation reverses ₹6 lakh previously expensed and credits the remaining ₹12 lakh to OCI. Assuming unchanged tax base, taxable differences throughout and a 20% rate, tax liability rises by ₹3.6 lakh: ₹1.2 lakh through profit or loss and ₹2.4 lakh through OCI.

Illustrative example 6: Rate movement without a new uplift

The closing taxable difference remains ₹40 lakh. The applicable sale rate changes from 20% to 25% under law substantively enacted by reporting date. Liability rises from ₹8 lakh to ₹10 lakh; trace the ₹2 lakh movement to the originating items for presentation.

Ten-step verification table

StepActionEvidence
1Identify the entity's accounting framework and asset classAccounting policy and asset register
2Confirm that the parcel is non-depreciableTitle, nature and accounting assessment
3Separate land and building in the valuationAllocation and valuation report
4Confirm use of the Ind AS 16 revaluation modelClass policy and approval
5Reconcile the carrying amount before and after upliftFixed asset and revaluation ledgers
6Determine the deduction under a sale scenarioTax basis and title memorandum
7Verify rate and effective-date assumptionsEnactment and reversal analysis
8Calculate opening and closing temporary differencesDeferred tax working
9Allocate each movement by originOCI and profit or loss bridge
10Review recognition, presentation and disclosuresClosing journal, disclosure tie-out and sign-off

Sixteen practitioner FAQs

1. Does ongoing factory use permit use-basis measurement for land?

For qualifying non-depreciable land under paragraph 51B, measure using sale consequences.

2. Does paragraph 51B require the board to plan a sale?

No. It prescribes a measurement basis for the qualifying asset.

3. Do we recognise current tax on the revaluation automatically?

A book revaluation alone does not establish a current tax liability; apply actual tax law separately.

4. Is tax base always original purchase cost?

No. Determine the amount deductible under applicable sale tax law.

5. Can the valuer determine the tax base?

The valuation supports carrying amount; the tax base needs independent legal and documentary support.

6. Should we discount the tax if the land will be held for decades?

No. Ind AS 12 prohibits discounting deferred tax balances.

7. What if a site includes a depreciable building?

Separate it from land and assess its own recovery method and tax base.

8. What if the accounting asset called land is depreciable?

Test the paragraph 51B condition on the facts. The label alone is insufficient.

9. Does the same rule apply automatically to investment property?

First establish the applicable accounting standard and model. Paragraph 51B is framed around non-depreciable assets using the Ind AS 16 revaluation model.

10. Can the entire closing balance be charged to OCI?

Trace the movement by origin; the opening balance may include unrelated components.

11. Can a future rate announcement be used at year-end?

Check whether the law is enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.

12. Does a deductible temporary difference always create an asset?

No. Apply the recognition criteria, including the availability of appropriate taxable profit where required.

13. What if the tax consequences vary by recovery timing?

Document the tax law and assumptions applicable to the reversal, keeping paragraph 51B's sale basis.

14. Can the revaluation uplift itself make tax base rise?

Only if the tax law independently changes the deductible basis; the accounting entry is insufficient.

15. Why retain both opening and closing values?

They separate the total balance from the movement to be posted and allocated.

16. What if a downward revaluation uses an existing OCI balance?

Determine the accounting allocation under Ind AS 16, then trace related deferred tax to the corresponding component under Ind AS 12.

Official sources

MCA: Ind AS 12, paragraphs 15, 24, 47, 51–51B, 53 and 58–63 MCA: Ind AS 16, revaluation model and land/building separation